PRISM: ancestry-aware integration of tissue-specific genomic annotations enhances the transferability of polygenic scores

Abstract

The limited transferability of polygenic scores (PGS) across populations constrains their clinical utility and risks exacerbating health disparities, given challenges in multi-ancestry training, fine-mapping, and variant prioritization using genomic annotations, particularly when biologically relevant reference resources are sparse or unavailable for the target population. Here, we introduce PRISM, a transfer learning approach that jointly addresses these challenges to enhance PGS transferability.

Type
Publication
Preprint posted on bioRxiv, 2025

Accurate genetic prediction of complex traits has the potential to substantially reduce the disease burden, but the limited transferability of polygenic score (PGS) across genetic ancestry groups remains a major challenge.

PGS aggregates the genetic effects across many variants into one score.
Here we propose to integrate three major approaches to address the PGS transferability. We develop PRISM and apply it to 7352 fine-mapped variants from MVP, 414 ENCODE annotations, and 406,659 individuals from the UK Biobank.
PRISM integrates 3 major approaches to address PGS transferability.
Using PRISM, we evaluated the effects of ancestry and tissue-specific integration of genomic annotations. We also compared our approach with existing methods and investigated which genomic annotation would be the most informative.
Ancestry- and tissue-specific PRISM models
We found that tissue-matched genomic annotations (from ENCODE) are most effective for enhancing PGS transferability, even though the tissue-agnostic strategy can leverage a ~18-fold larger number of genomic annotation datasets.
Ancestry- and tissue-specific PRISM models
Similarly, the use of genetic ancestry-specific fine-mapped variants is most effective, despite the power difference. Our approach offers a pragmatic solution for working with data with uneven coverage across contexts.
Ancestry- and tissue-specific PRISM models
Our benchmarking analysis shows PRISM benefits from three different strategies for enhancing PGS transferability.
Ancestry- and tissue-specific PRISM models
We showed, through feature importance analysis, that having one reference genomic annotation is not sufficient, highlighting the advantage of systematic integration with our approach.
Ancestry- and tissue-specific PRISM models
We confirm that the genetic variants selected from our approach are supported by various genomic annotations compared to other variants in LD.
Ancestry- and tissue-specific PRISM models
I am grateful to Lucy and the team for making this work possible.
Ancestry- and tissue-specific PRISM models